Legal Opinion

Claim for Compensation of Tomondong v. Ikezaki

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1932No. 2048PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE OOUKT BY

BANKS, J.

The instant proceeding was originally begun before the industrial accident board and was brought under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Ch. 209, R. L. 1925). The board awarded compensation against the defendant and in favor of claimant as follows: “ * * * the costs of medical, surgical and hospital services and supplies, as provided under chapter 209, Revised Laws of Hawaii 1925, and for and during a period of his said total and permanent disability, commencing with January 27th, 1930, the eighth day of the said disability, a weekly…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Barton v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Matter of Beach v. . VelzyNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Otani v. City and County of Haw.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1998
  2. Pratt v. KondoHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Locations, Inc. v. Hawai'i Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Suzuki v. CASTLE & COOKE RESORTSHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Chai Ex Rel. Chai v. MurataHawaii Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API