Legal Opinion

Suzuki v. CASTLE & COOKE RESORTS

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 2010No. 28742PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

FUJISE, J.

Plaintiff-Appellant Gary Suzuki (Suzuki) appeals from the August 15, 2007 judgment of the Circuit Court of the Second Circuit 1 (circuit court) in favor of Defendant-Appellee Castle & Cooke Resorts (Appellee) on Suzuki’s personal injury claim. The sole issue on appeal is whether Appellee was immune from suit under the exclusive remedy provision of Hawai'i’s workers’ compensation law given that Suzuki had received workers’ compensation benefits from a joint insurance policy held by Appellee’s parent company, Castle & Cooke, Inc. (Castle & Cooke). We conclude…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Associated Vendors, Inc. v. Oakland Meat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Robert's Hawaii School Bus, Inc. v. Laupahoehoe Transportation Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Wells v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Boggs v. Blue Diamond Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  5. Konno v. County of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adams v. Dole Food Co.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Rolloffs Hawaii, LLC - Adversary ProceedingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API