Legal Opinion

Susquehanna Boom Co. v. West Branch Boom Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 7, 1884PublishedCited by 7 opinions

IN ERROR. TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.' Motion to dismiss a cause brought here from a State court by writ of error, on the ground that the federal question was not raised in the court below.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.: The Susquehanna Boom Company was incorporated by the General Assembly of Pennsylvania on the 26th of March, 1846, and as early as 1849 erected, under its charter, a boom in the West Branch of the Susquehanna River, at Williamsport, for the .purpose of securing logs and other lumber floating, in tihe river. Its charter did not purport to confer upon it any ¿x-clusive rights to the use of the river above the boom for bringing logs down.

On the 26th of March, 1849, the West Branch Boom Company was incorporated to construct and maintain a boom (on the south…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. O'Neil v. VermontSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Clark v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. International Indemnity Co. v. CoachmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Simmerman v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Prensa Insular De Puerto Rico, Inc. v. People of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API