O'Neil v. Vermont
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF VERMONT. This case came on for argument in regular course on the 4th day of December in October term, 1889. ■ The court ordered the case to be passed to be heard before a full bench. When reached at October term, 1890, it was again passed in consequence of the illness of counsel. The case as now made is stated in the opinion'of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatcheord
On the 26th of December, 1882, a grand juror, of the town of Rutland, in the county of Rutland and State of Yermont, made a written complaint, on his oath of office, before a justice ■of the peace of that county, that John O’Neil, of Whitehall, New York, on December 25th, 1882,. at Rutland, at divers times, did “sell, furnish and give away intoxicating liquor, without authority,”.and contrary to the statute, and further, that O’Neil, at the March term, 1819, of the Rutland County court, had been convicted of selling, furnishing and giving away intoxicating liquors, against the law. Thereupon…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Bowman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Works Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Leeper v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by263 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
258 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.