Legal Opinion

McFarland & Steele v. Ætna Fire & Marine Insurance

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1873PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Paull, Judge.

In this case, the action is the same and by the same Plaintiffs as in the case against the Peabody Insurance Company, heretofore decided.

The policy is the same in its provisions, and the same questions arise in regard to the provision of limitation, and of waiver, as were presented and decided in the latter case. The insurance here is upon the same property, and the loss occasioned by the same fire.

There is in the present case however no question arising upon an alleged breach of warranty. In this case alsoj as in the former, an action had been brought by the Plaintiffs within…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Melson v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Muse v. London Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Belch v. Seaboard Air Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Ray v. Liberty Industrial Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Prete v. Royal Globe InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API