Legal Opinion

Rose v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 25, 1940No. [Nos. 22, 23, January Term, 1940.]PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

In more than one respect these appeals fail to comply with the requirements for review in this court, but as they are taken from a conviction of murder in the first degree and a sentence of death, the court has examined what is presented in a brief record; and it has found no showing of error in the trial proceedings. Having actually reviewed the case, or so much of the proceedings as the record recites, it will affirm the judgment rather than dismiss the appeals.

The docket entries reproduced show that upon her arraignment Martha Rose, appearing by attorney, pleaded “Not guilty,” and elected…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1821
  2. Norris v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  3. Finan v. M. C.C. of CumberlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  4. Wyatt v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  5. League v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  2. State Ex Rel. Sonner v. ShearinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. State v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Heath v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API