Legal Opinion

Harriman v. United States

District Court, D. Maine

Decided January 4, 2012No. 1:11-cv-208-NTPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

NANCY TORRESEN, District Judge.

This case comes before the Court on Defendant United States of America, Rural Development, Department of Agriculture’s (“USDA”) Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs Gregory and Kathryn Harriman’s complaint for redemption of their real property. None of the relevant facts are in dispute and the law is well-settled in this area, requiring judgment in favor of the USDA.

In 1991, the Harrimans obtained a loan from the USDA in the amount of $62,200, which was secured by a mortgage on their real property in Waldo County, Maine…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fleet Bank of Maine v. HarrimanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  2. Harriman v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2000
  3. United States v. HarrimanDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API