Legal Opinion
United States v. Harriman
District Court, D. Maine
Decided November 2, 2010No. CV-09-348-B-WPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE AND ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge.
Concluding that the mortgagee inadvertently failed to comply with the public notice provisions of its earlier foreclosure judgment, the Court grants the mortgagee’s motion to amend the foreclosure judgment to void the public sale and to provide for a new period of public notice and sale, and the Court denies the mortgagors’ motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), seeking to void the entire Foreclosure Judgment. Applying Maine law,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Keybank National Ass'n v. SargentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Winter v. Casco Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Kolmosky v. KolmoskySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- United States v. One Rural Lot No. 10,356Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Cadle Co. v. LCM ASSOCIATESSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harriman v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2012
- PALM AVENUE HIALEAH TRUST v. SIDELINGERDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
- WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY FSB AS TRUSTEE OF STANWICH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST v. LAFERRIEREDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2023