Legal Opinion

OKLAHOMA ASSOC. OF OPTOMETRIC PHYSICIANS v. RAPER

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 6, 2018No. Case Number: 115938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColbert, J.

¶1 The sole issue presented for consideration is whether Initiative Petition No. 415, State Question No. 793, satisfies the single subject requirement of article 24, section 1, of the Oklahoma Constitution. We limit our inquiry to deciding the "challenges fundamental to the validity of the Petition as a whole." In re Initiative Petition No. 348, State Question No. 640, 1991 OK 110, ¶ 2, 820 P.2d 772, 774. In doing so, we reemphasize that it is the prerogative of the Oklahoma voters, not this Court, to determine the propriety of Initiative Petition No. 415. See Id. For the reasons expressed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Initiative Petition No. 344, State Question No. 630Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. In Re Initiative Petition No. 314Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Douglas v. Cox Retirement Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  4. In Re Initiative Petition No. 382Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. In Re Initiative Petition No. 360Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. OKLAHOMA ASSOC. OF OPTOMETRIC PHYSICIANS v. RAPERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  2. OKLAHOMA ASSOC. OF OPTOMETRIC PHYSICIANS v. RAPERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API