Land v. Neill Pontiac, Incorporated
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHedeice, J.
The sole question presented upon this appeal is whether the record discloses that the plaintiff’s alleged cause of action was barred by the three-year statute of limitations. G.S. 1-52. The uncontroverted facts as they appear in the record are: (1) That the auto mobile manufactured by the defendant General Motors Corporation was sold to the plaintiff by the defendant Neill Pontiac, Incorporated, on 30 January 1965; (2) the collision wherein plaintiff alleged that he was injured occurred on 22 March 1965; (3) the summons commencing this action was issued 20 March 1968.
The pivotal issue is when…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shearin v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Thurston Motor Lines, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- City of Reidsville v. BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Lewis v. Godwin Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brantley v. DunstanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Flexolite Electrical, Ltd. v. GilliamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Williams v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1975
- Thomas William Green v. M. T. D. Products, Inc. And the Goodyear Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Grooms v. MED. SOCIETY OF SCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.