Legal Opinion

Land v. Neill Pontiac, Incorporated

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 1969No. 6922SC340PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHedeice, J.

The sole question presented upon this appeal is whether the record discloses that the plaintiff’s alleged cause of action was barred by the three-year statute of limitations. G.S. 1-52. The uncontroverted facts as they appear in the record are: (1) That the auto mobile manufactured by the defendant General Motors Corporation was sold to the plaintiff by the defendant Neill Pontiac, Incorporated, on 30 January 1965; (2) the collision wherein plaintiff alleged that he was injured occurred on 22 March 1965; (3) the summons commencing this action was issued 20 March 1968.

The pivotal issue is when…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shearin v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. City of Reidsville v. BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Lewis v. Godwin Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brantley v. DunstanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Flexolite Electrical, Ltd. v. GilliamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Williams v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1975
  4. Thomas William Green v. M. T. D. Products, Inc. And the Goodyear Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  5. Grooms v. MED. SOCIETY OF SCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API