Legal Opinion

In Re McKenna

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 12, 1991No. 66,150PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an original proceeding in discipline filed by the disciplinary administrator against Patrick E. McKenna, of Kingman, Kansas, an attorney duly admitted to the practice of law in Kansas. A hearing panel of the Kansas Board for Discipline of Attorneys unanimously found a violation of Model Rules of Professional Conduct 8.4(d) and (g), Supreme Court Rule 226 (1990 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 290), in that respondent’s conduct was prejudicial to the administration of justice and adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law.

The facts as stipulated to by the parties were accepted by the panel…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Care & Treatment of GirardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. In Re PistotnikSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. In Re PomeroySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  4. In re McKennaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  5. In re Minter - (Supreme Court of Kansas · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API