Legal Opinion

In re the Care & Treatment of Girard

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 11, 2013No. 103,505; No. 103,506PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nuss, C.J.:

If expert opinion testimony based on scientific methods or procedures is offered as evidence in Kansas state courts, the offering party must satisfy the Frye test. See Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923). That test requires a “showing that the basis of a scientific opinion is generally accepted as reliable within the expert’s particular scientific field.” State v. Shadden, 290 Kan. 803, 819, 235 P.3d 436 (2010).

*373In these proceedings to declare Douglas Girard and Eugene Mallard sexually violent predators, they ask us to instead…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. In Re Commitment of SimonsIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. ShaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  5. State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. SeacatSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. – State v. Lyman –Supreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  3. In re Care & Treatment of ConeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  4. State v. HaneySupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  5. Alain Ellis Living Trust v. Harvey D. Ellis Living TrustSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API