Legal Opinion
Coakley-Simelton v. Georgetown University
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 7, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2018-2014Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TAMMI COAKLEY-SIMELTON, Plaintiff, v. No. 18-cv-2014 (DLF) GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Tammi Coakley-Simelton brings this action against her employer, Georgetown University, and three of its employees, Annamarie Bianco, Laura Soerensson, and Wallace Michael Canter. See Compl., Dkt. 1. She alleges that the defendants retaliated and discriminated against her based on her race, in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. (Title VII), and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (DCHRA), D.C.…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.