Legal Opinion
Smith v. Walle Corp.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided October 20, 2014No. Civil Action No. 5:13-219-DCRPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge.
Defendant Walle Corporation (“Walle”) has moved for summary judgment on Plaintiff Deming Smith’s claims for age-related discrimination in violation of the Kentucky Civil Rights Act (“KCRA”), KRS Chapter 344 et seq. [Record No. 10]1 In addition to a hostile work environment claim, Smith alleges that Walle discriminated against him because of his age by giving his younger co-workers a raise that he was denied and by terminating his employment. Smith further alleges that, after he filed a discrimination complaint, Walle retaliated…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Holum v. AECOM, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
- Martin v. Baptist Health RichmondDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022
- Oehler v. Eclipse Senior Living, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2024