Legal Opinion
Holum v. AECOM, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided April 15, 2020No. 5:18-cv-00035Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON RODNEY HOLUM, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. v. ) 5:18-cv-35-JMH ) URS FEDERAL SERVICE, INC., ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) AND ORDER Defendant. ) *** This matter comes before the Court on Defendant URS Federal Services, Inc.’s (“URS”) Motion for Summary Judgment. [DE 51]. Having considered the matter fully, and being otherwise sufficiently advised, URS’s Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 51] will be granted. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The circumstances giving rise to this case are largely undisputed.…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.