Legal Opinion
E. F. Hauserman Co. v. Wright Metal, Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 31, 1932No. 1011PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
The action has been brought to-restrain infringement of certain patents and for damages resulting therefrom. The answer denies infringement, and sets up a counterclaim for infringement of a certain patent not included among those mentioned in the bill of complaint.
Plaintiff moved to dismiss the counterclaim on the ground that there is a mis*44joinder of parties therein. The counterclaim, contained the allegation that it was based on infringements of letters patent of Wright Metal, Incorporated. Pending the decision of the motion, on stipulation of the parties, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Littlefield v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Birdsell v. ShaliolSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Foundry Equipment Co. v. Carl-Mayer Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1950