Foundry Equipment Co. v. Carl-Mayer Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Chief Judge.
This is a patent infringement action. Defendants have answered and have set up two counterclaims based on patent infringement, unfair trade practices and monopolistic trade practices.
Plaintiff moves to strike the counterclaims because (1) neither action arises out of the subject matter of the complaint, (2) misjoinder of federal and nonfederal causes, and (3) the asserted causes do not rest on substantially identical facts.
Defendant in a patent infringement suit has the right to counterclaim for patent infringement by plaintiff of defendant’s patents. This is true even if…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hancock Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- French Renovating Co. v. Ray Renovating Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.