Brent Boyd v. Bert Bell/pete Rozelle Nfl Players Retirement Plan Nfl Player Supplemental Disability Plan the Disability Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
Former professional football player Brent Boyd appeals the denial of football degenerative disability benefits under the Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle National Football League Player Retirement Plan (“the NFL Plan” or “Plan”). The Plan provides retirement, disability, and other benefits to eligible current and former professional football players. The district-court granted the NFL Plan’s motion' for summary judgment, holding that the Plan’s Retirement Board (“the Board”) did not abuse its discretion in denying Boyd’s claim for football degenerative disability benefits. We have…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Richard Atwood v. Newmont Gold Co., Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Mary Anne Bendixen v. Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Montour v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Almont Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLC v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- D & H Therapy Associates, LLC v. Boston Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Cady v. Hartford Life & Accidental InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2013
- Tibble v. Edison InternationalDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.