Legal Opinion

Brading v. County of Georgetown

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 28, 1997No. 24654PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

On appeal is an order of the special referee finding a street in North Litchfield Beach had been dedicated to and accepted by the public as a street and that the street’s proposed improvement to include parking for beach access did not constitute a nuisance per accidens. 1 We affirm.

FACTS

The “street” in question, Second Street North, is in an area of North Litchfield Beach which was purchased by Edwin Boyle and Thomas Boyle in the 1940’s. In the 1950’s, the Boyles decided to subdivide the property. In 1952, a trust was set up for the benefit of the Boyles’ children, including Appellant Gene…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Southern Development Land & Golf Co. v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Kreutner v. DavidSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Biales v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Resolution Trust v. EAGLE LAKE CONDOS.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Home Sales, Inc. v. City of North Myrtle BeachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Maher v. Tietex Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Pruitt v. South Carolina Medical Malpractice Liability Joint Underwriting Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Ahrens v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Swanson v. StratosCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Mazloom v. MazloomCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API