Kreutner v. David
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Finney, Chief Justice:
The circuit court granted respondent David’s summary judgment motion, finding appellant Kreutner’s suit for breach of fiduciary duty barred by the statute of limitations. Kreutner appeals. We affirm.
Browning owned a Charleston health club. Kreutner was recruited to loan Browning $50,000 to build a pool at the club. David, an attorney, “vouched” for Browning’s creditworthiness, and offered as additional security for the loan a mortgage on three Florida lots owned by Browning. In a letter dated July 29, 1983, David wrote Kreutner’s attorney stating he would record the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wiggins v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Citizens & Southern National Bank of South Carolina v. LanfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Vines v. Self Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Strong v. University of South Carolina School of MedicineSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
3Cited by34 opinions
- I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Moriarty v. Garden Sanctuary Church of GodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Wells v. City of LynchburgCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Young v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- Brown v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.