Legal Opinion

Kreutner v. David

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 16, 1995No. 24332PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Chief Justice:

The circuit court granted respondent David’s summary judgment motion, finding appellant Kreutner’s suit for breach of fiduciary duty barred by the statute of limitations. Kreutner appeals. We affirm.

Browning owned a Charleston health club. Kreutner was recruited to loan Browning $50,000 to build a pool at the club. David, an attorney, “vouched” for Browning’s creditworthiness, and offered as additional security for the loan a mortgage on three Florida lots owned by Browning. In a letter dated July 29, 1983, David wrote Kreutner’s attorney stating he would record the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wiggins v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Citizens & Southern National Bank of South Carolina v. LanfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  3. Vines v. Self Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Strong v. University of South Carolina School of MedicineSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Moriarty v. Garden Sanctuary Church of GodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Wells v. City of LynchburgCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Young v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Brown v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API