Legal Opinion

United States v. Joseph Florence De Loy

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 11, 1970No. 27900PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:

In this Dyer Act case the problem of a voluntarily loquacious defendant presents once again the question of the proper limits of the Massiah 1 rule.

The defendant, Joseph Florence DeLoy, was found guilty by a jury of interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle and was sentenced to two years in prison. He now appeals, asserting that certain evidence introduced at his trial was inadmissible. The sole issue presented is the extent to which Massiah, interdicts the admission into evidence of post-indictment incriminating admissions by a defendant. We do not find…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. James Leo Huth v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. William Joseph Coughlan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. Donald Roy CrispCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  2. United States v. Bienvenido Mercado VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. State v. HattonIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  4. United States v. James B. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. State v. MeltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API