Legal Opinion

Bussell v. Ross

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1910No. 8838PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Main, J., entered December 8, 1909, granting an injunction pendente lite after a hearing before the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

The respondents brought this action to restrain E. W. Ross, commissioner of public lands, from issuing, and the other defendants from receiving, placing of record, transferring or negotiating, certificates on tide land fills upon certain described lands owned by the respondents, for an amount in excess of the actual cost of the work, with fifteen per cent added, and in no event to exceed in amount the number of cubic yards filled on any lot, multiplied by sixteen cents. The trial court issued an injunction pendente lite upon a preliminary showing, and the defendants have appealed from that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Noble v. Union River Logging RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Seattle & Lake Washington Waterway Co. v. Seattle Dock Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Mississippi Valley Trust Co. v. HofiusWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Scholpp v. ForrestWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richards v. BussellWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Bussell v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API