Legal Opinion

Richards v. Bussell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1912No. 10392PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered January 24, 1912, upon finding the amount due on tide land certificates, in an action to foreclose liens therefor.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This is an action to foreclose a number of liens upon certain tide land lots in Seattle, evidenced by certificates issued by the commissioner of public lands of the state of Washington under the provisions of the act of 1893 relating to the excavation of waterways and filling of tide *556lands by private contract. A decree of foreclosure was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, but for less amounts than were evidenced by the certificates, and claimed by him. Both the plaintiff and the defendants have appealed; so to avoid confusion we will hereafter refer to them as such.

On October 27, 1894, under…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Legg v. LeggWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. McGill v. W. P. Fuller & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Criswell v. Board of Directors of Everett School District No. 24Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Ditmar v. DitmarWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Potwin v. BlasherWashington Supreme Court · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bracy v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
  2. Eastman & Co. v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Tipton v. Standard Installment Finance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. Gebby v. CarrilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Taylor v. McKennettWashington Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API