Legal Opinion

Seattle & Lake Washington Waterway Co. v. Seattle Dock Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1904No. 5011PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, L, entered October 14, 1903, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff after a trial upon the merits before the court without a jury, foreclosing the lien of a waterway company for its improvement of tide lands.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This action was brought by respondents to foreclose certain liens on tide lands in the city of Seattle. The liens arose under the provisions of chapter 99 of the laws of 1893, page 241 (Bal. Code, §§ 4080-4089), entitled, “An act prescribing the ways in which waterways for the uses of navigation may be excavated by private contract, providing for liens upon tide and shore lands belonging to the state, granting rights-of-way across lands belonging to the state.”

The complaint contains five causes of action, each cause being based upon a lien upon a separate tract of land. The complaint alleges,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lancey v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Allen v. ForrestWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Mississippi Valley Trust Co. v. HofiusWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Scholpp v. ForrestWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In Re HuletWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Pioneer Sand & Gravel Co. v. Seattle Construction & Dry Dock Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. State v. Asotin CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Higher Education Facilities Authority v. GardnerWashington Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API