Legal Opinion

Bomar v. Echols

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 8, 1978No. 20678PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rhodes, Justice:

In this action, the plaintiffs-respondents seek to enjoin the defendant-appellant from developing a tract of land for use as a mobile home subdivision claiming that development for such a use violates certain restrictive covenants which, it is alleged, apply to the appellant’s tract. There are no restrictions in the appellant’s deed and the sole question is whether restrictions found in deeds of some of the respondents give rise to reciprocal negative easements which are enforceable against the appellant. The lower court granted the injunction sought by the respondents. We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. EDWARDS v. SurrattSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  3. McDONALD v. WELBORNSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  4. Nance v. WaldropSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  5. Arrants v. RankinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. CCM, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  2. Markey v. WolfCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Butler v. Sea Pines Plantation Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Shipyard Property Owners' Ass'n v. MangiaracinaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Egan v. Catholic Bishop of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API