Legal Opinion

Arrants v. Rankin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 19, 1977No. 20435PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Justice:

The plaintiffs are owners of lots, upon which residences have been built, in a real estate development known as “Ragin Estates.” The defendant Naomi Ragin has been and still is developing the property. Laurence S. Rankin, Jr., James T. Rankin and Robert H. Rankin, d/b/a Rankin Realty Company, purchased a lot from Ragin and have begun grading it for the erection of a commercial enterprise referred to as a convenience store.

Plaintiffs, by bringing this action, seek a permanent injunction prohibiting both defendants from using the property for any purpose other than…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cisson v. Pickens Savings and Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  2. Eagle Const. Co., Inc. v. Richland Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  3. Nance v. WaldropSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  4. Cheves v. City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  5. Garrett v. ReeseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Bomar v. EcholsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. South Carolina Farm Bureau v. ScottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API