Arrants v. Rankin
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Littlejohn, Justice:
The plaintiffs are owners of lots, upon which residences have been built, in a real estate development known as “Ragin Estates.” The defendant Naomi Ragin has been and still is developing the property. Laurence S. Rankin, Jr., James T. Rankin and Robert H. Rankin, d/b/a Rankin Realty Company, purchased a lot from Ragin and have begun grading it for the erection of a commercial enterprise referred to as a convenience store.
Plaintiffs, by bringing this action, seek a permanent injunction prohibiting both defendants from using the property for any purpose other than…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cisson v. Pickens Savings and Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
- Eagle Const. Co., Inc. v. Richland Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Nance v. WaldropSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
- Cheves v. City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Garrett v. ReeseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
3Cited by3 opinions
- South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Bomar v. EcholsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- South Carolina Farm Bureau v. ScottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980