Quinter v. Quinter
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 233, Jan. T., 1918, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Berks Co., June T., 1917, No. 48, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of Charles R. Quinter, Sr., v. Cora Belle Quinter. Assumpsit for the purchase price of real estate. Before Endlich, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. •Verdict for plaintiff for $1,782.75 and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed. Errors assigned were instructions to the jury.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Frazer,
Plaintiff executed to his daughter-in-law, the defendant, a deed for a house and lot for the expressed consideration of'two thousand dollars, and about a week *197later also- executed a bill of sale for the household furniture and other personal property on the premises for a consideration of seventy-five dollars. Against the realty was a mortgage with an unpaid balance of six hundred dollars which defendant paid, but made no further payment on account of either realty or personalty. Plaintiff sued in assumpsit and recovered a verdict for the entire balance and, from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Henry v. ZurfliehSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Ott v. Oyer'sSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
- Rowand v. FinneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
- Taylor v. SattlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Browarsky's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fisher v. BrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Kotler v. John Hancock, C., Ins. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- E. Richard Meinig Co. v. Raw Silk Trading Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1925
- Kopka v. Bell Telephone Co. of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Kopka v. Bell Telephone Co. of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952