Legal Opinion

E. Richard Meinig Co. v. Raw Silk Trading Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County

Decided November 9, 1925No. 141Published

1Opinion of the Court

Biddle, P. J.,

9th judicial district, specially presiding,

In this action of foreign attachment in assumpsit, plaintiff, on July 27, 1921, entered a judgment, by default, against defendant for $38,115.16. A scire *646facias was issued against the garnishee, D. G. Dery, Inc., and an issue framed by the entry of pleas of “nulla bona” and “set-off.” The issue so framed came to trial in this court on April 16, 1924, and at its conclusion the court, rejecting items of set-off claimed by the garnishee, which, if allowed, would have shown the defendant indebted to the garnishee, directed a verdict in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Safe Deposit Bank v. County of SchuylkillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. Quinter v. QuinterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API