Legal Opinion
Potts v. First Nat. Bank
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 13, 1930No. 19368PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TEEHEE, C.
On March 9, 1927, defendant in error, the First National Bank of Durant, sued plaintiffs in error, E. F. Potts and Fannie E. Potts, to recover on their promissory note of $2,383.95, and to foreclose a pledge of personalty given in security-thereof. The instruments were dated December 23, 1926, and matured on February 1, 1927.
Plaintiff’s petition was in the usual form in such cases.
Upon unsuccessful demurrer, defendants, by unverified answer, denied the execution of the instruments sued on, and further alleged matter in avoidance of the legal effect thereof if the same were executed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth Nat. Bank of Dallas, Tex. v. BaughmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Home Insurance Co. of N.Y. v. WhitchurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Bass Furn. & Carpet Co. v. FinleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Brown v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Johns v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lambert v. RainboltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Save Sales Co. v. FutralSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- McCall v. DuffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Bingenheimer v. Holcomb & Hoke Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930