Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Development Commission v. Hair

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1987No. 2-1185-A-360PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Judge.

The plaintiff Metropolitan Development Commission of Marion County (Commission) appeals the trial court's denial of the Commission's request to enjoin Jeffrey L. Hair and Janet Hair (Hairs) from maintaining multi-family dwellings at 69 North Iry-ington Avenue and 106 South Ritter Avenue in Indianapolis.

We affirm.

The Commission presents several issues for our review on appeal. However, we need only address one of those issues in order to reach our decision.

Did the trial court err in determining that the properties qualified for the nonconforming use exception to the zoning…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chayt v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  2. City of Elkhart v. MiddletonIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Lutz v. New Albany City Plan CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Anderson Lumber & Supply Co. v. FletcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  5. O'BANION v. State Ex Rel. ShivelyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. City of CarmelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Hannon v. Metropolitan Development CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Metropolitan Development Commission v. GoodmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Metropolitan Development Commission v. SchroederIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Harbour Town Associates, Ltd. v. City of NoblesvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API