Hannon v. Metropolitan Development Commission
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Defendant-Appellants, Terrence Hannon, Jeffrey L. and Janet L. Hair, and Leroy and Christine Proud (Appellants), appeal the ruling in favor of the Plaintiff-Appellee, the Metropolitan Development Commission of Marion County (Commission), resulting in an injunction against Appellants.
We affirm.
ISSUES
The Appellants present the following restated and consolidated issues for our review:
1. Whether the trial court erred in finding that the Dwelling Districts Zoning Ordinance complied with. Ind.Code 36-1-5-4.
2. Whether the trial court erred in granting the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Paramo v. EdwardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- City of Crown Point v. Lake CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
- Perry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
- Hendricks County Bank & Trust Co. v. Guthrie Building Materials, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Saurer v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- City of New Haven v. Chemical Waste Management of Indiana, L.L.C.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Indiana Real Estate Commission v. AckmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Metropolitan Development Commission v. SchroederIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Steuben County v. Family Development, Ltd.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Town of Georgetown v. SewellIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.