Tunnell v. Berry
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
The first issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred by concluding that the words “brothers and sisters or their heirs” in the will of John Berry were words of limitation rather than words of purchase, and that as such they served only to preserve the ancestral shares of the “brothers and sisters.”
Words of purchase in wills are those words which designate the persons to whom an estate in land is granted, while words of limitation are those which define the quantum of interest given and fixes the time for the commencement of the estate. The word “heirs” may…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mercer v. . DownsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- DIXIELAND REALTY COMPANY v. WysorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Lawson v. LawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Hutchinson v. . LucasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rowett v. McFarlandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Hollowell v. HollowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992