Legal Opinion

Hollowell v. Hollowell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 4, 1992No. 918SC598PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

' We first note that this appeal is before us on partial summary judgment. Pursuant to the provisions of G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 54, the trial court certified this judgment for immediate appeal.

A party may resort to the courts for the construction of a will when there are doubts as to a testator’s intent and the terms of a will are not set out in clear, unequivocal and unambiguous language. Pittman v. Thomas, 307 N.C. 485, 299 S.E.2d 207 (1983). It is well settled in this jurisdiction that the responsibility to interpret or construe a will is solely that of the courts. Wachovia Bank…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ladd v. Estate of KellenbergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Poindexter v. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Pittman v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Strickland v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rutledge v. FeherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API