Legal Opinion

Rowett v. McFarland

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1986No. 15061PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERTZ, Acting Justice.

Rowetts appeal from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of appel-lees McFarland, et al. We reverse and remand.

Facts

This appeal concerns the determination of the consistently troubling question of whether a remainder is vested or contingent. In assessing case authority from foreign jurisdictions, the only conclusion which may be safely entertained is that the opinions are in conflict.

The focal point of this action is approximately 3,000 acres of real property located in Meade County, South Dakota. The conflict arises from its disputed ownership. Ewell…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. State v. HollandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ebey v. AdamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Waxson Realty Corp. v. RothschildNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ziegler Furniture & Funeral Home, Inc. v. CicmanecSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Westover v. East River Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re the Estate of StevensonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Matter of ZarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. BlackburnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API