People v. O'CONNELL
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORRISON, J.
Joshua Mark O’Connell was convicted of several drug offenses and referred to a drug treatment program. The trial court terminated appellant from the program after he failed to attend any sessions. In this appeal we reject appellant’s claim that his termination was based on inadmissible hearsay. We will remand the case, however, because the court ordered appellant to pay for the costs of probation supervision without inquiring into his ability to pay.
Facts and Proceedings
Appellant was charged by complaint with one count of possession of a controlled substance (Health & Saf.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. ArreolaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. MakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. WinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. PachecoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. GuilfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. ShepherdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. KellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.