Legal Opinion

People v. O'CONNELL

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 2003No. C040876PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORRISON, J.

Joshua Mark O’Connell was convicted of several drug offenses and referred to a drug treatment program. The trial court terminated appellant from the program after he failed to attend any sessions. In this appeal we reject appellant’s claim that his termination was based on inadmissible hearsay. We will remand the case, however, because the court ordered appellant to pay for the costs of probation supervision without inquiring into his ability to pay.

Facts and Proceedings

Appellant was charged by complaint with one count of possession of a controlled substance (Health & Saf.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. ArreolaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. MakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. WinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. People v. HartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. People v. PachecoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. People v. GuilfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. People v. ShepherdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. People v. KellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API