Legal Opinion

People v. Arreola

California Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1994No. S034323PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, J.

In Morrissey v. Brewer (1972) 408 U.S. 471, 489 [33 L.Ed.2d 484, 499, 92 S.Ct. 2593], and Gagnon v. Scarpelli (1973) 411 U.S. 778, 786 [36 L.Ed.2d 656, 664, 93 S.Ct. 1756], the United States Supreme Court held that, under the due process clause of the federal Constitution, a defendant at a parole or probation revocation hearing generally has the right “to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses (unless the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing confrontation). . . Applying Morrissey and Gagnon, this court held in People v. Winson (1981) 29 Cal.3d…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. InadiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. People v. GeierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People v. WileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Michels v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
  4. People v. Eddie M.California Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API