People v. Arreola
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEORGE, J.
In Morrissey v. Brewer (1972) 408 U.S. 471, 489 [33 L.Ed.2d 484, 499, 92 S.Ct. 2593], and Gagnon v. Scarpelli (1973) 411 U.S. 778, 786 [36 L.Ed.2d 656, 664, 93 S.Ct. 1756], the United States Supreme Court held that, under the due process clause of the federal Constitution, a defendant at a parole or probation revocation hearing generally has the right “to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses (unless the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing confrontation). . . Applying Morrissey and Gagnon, this court held in People v. Winson (1981) 29 Cal.3d…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. InadiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- People v. GeierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. WileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Michels v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
- People v. Eddie M.California Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.