Legal Opinion

Williamson v. South Carolina Insurance Reserve Fund

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 25, 2003No. 25709PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHIEF JUSTICE TOAL:

This is an appeal from the circuit court. Respondents brought a declaratory judgment action to determine a number of issues involving interpretation of the South Carolina Tort Claims Act, S.C.Code Ann. §§ 15-78-10 through 200 (“TCA”). The trial court found that Respondents were entitled to collect the full $2.5 million in stipulated damages, and that the South Carolina Insurance Reserve Fund (“thé Fund”) was obligated, under the insurance policy it issued to Spartanburg County Health Services District, Inc., (“the District”) to pay this entire amount. The Fund and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southeastern Freight Lines v. City of HartsvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Dykema Ex Rel. Estate of Dykema v. Carolina Emergency Physicians, P.C.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boiter v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Boiter v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Cincinnati Insurance v. Urgent Care Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
  4. JRS Builders, Inc. v. NeunsingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  5. JRS Builders, Inc. v. NeunsingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API