Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Insurance v. Urgent Care Pharmacy, Inc.

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided February 7, 2006No. C.A. 7:04-1057-HMHPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HERLONG, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. After a review of the law and the facts of this case, the court denies Cincinnati Insurance Company’s (“Cincinnati”) motion for summary judgment and grants G. David Scy-ster (“Scyster”), Virginia Rauch (“Rauch”), Robert Conrad, as Administrator of the Estate of Vivian Conrad and Individually (“Conrad”), Annie McGill (“McGill”), and Donald M. Boles’ (“Boles”) (collectively “Movants”) motion for summary judgment. 1

I. Factual Background

Cincinnati filed a declaratory judgment action to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Schulmeyer v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  4. Gaskins v. Blue Cross-Blue ShieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  5. Quinn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API