Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Morris Construction Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 27, 1929No. 27,291PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
The appeal is from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
The complaint alleges that plaintiff is a dealer in building materials at Franklin, Minnesota; that the state highway department let a contract for the construction of certain culverts located on trunk highway No. 14 near the village of Franklin to defendant Morris Construction Company; that defendant surety company became its surety for the payment of lumber and material used therein; that plaintiff furnished at the request of the construction company cement for said work for which it has not paid.
The two defendants…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Taubert v. TaubertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- State v. YatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Harriott v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Kincaid v. JungkunzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- MacIllravie v. St. Barnabas HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- State v. Campbell & KopanskiNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1941
- St. George v. LollisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Freeman v. Morris Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932