Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 12, 1914No. Nos. 18,566—(5)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Defendant was indicted by the grand jury, tried in the district court for Itasca county before Stanton, J., and a jury, and convicted of the crime of selling intoxicating liquor to an intoxicated person. From an order denying her motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Defendant was convicted under the statute prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquor to an intoxicated person and sentenced to pay a fine of $500. She made a motion for a new trial and appealed from an order denying the motion. • :

The sale was made by the barkeeper in a saloon known as the Jack Jones saloon in the village of Deer river. Defendant is the wife of Jack Jones.. She was not at the saloon and had no knowledge of the sale. The prosecution is based upon the ground that she held the license under which the saloon was operated, and, by virtue of the statute relating to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. YatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. State v. AlmosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WorkmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. Freeman v. Morris Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Hylaman v. Midland InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. State v. KearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API