Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Morris Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 18, 1932No. 28,683PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.

Defendant appeals from the judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The case was here once before. 179 Minn. 94, 228 N. W. 442.

The action is one to recover the purchase price of a quantity of cement. It was tried before the court and a jury and a verdict returned in favor of the plaintiff. Defendant moved for a directed verdict and, after the trial, moved for judgment in its favor notwithstanding the verdict. Both motions were denied, judgment was thereafter entered, and this appeal taken.

Plaintiff is a dealer in lumber, cement, and other articles, at Franklin, Minnesota. Defendant Morris…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Freeman v. Morris Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jensen v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Robbins v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  3. Thelen v. GartnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API