Legal Opinion
People v. Wilson
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 13, 1966No. Crim. 10827PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DRUCKER, J. pro tem. *
The defendant appeals from an order denying her motion for a new trial, following a conviction of two counts of violation of section 11501, Health and Safety Code. She was committed for narcotic addiction. (Pen. Code, § 1237, suhd. 2.) The main contentions urged by defendant are: That she was denied her constitutional rights to a speedy trial and due process of law by reason of a deliberate delay in the presentation of evidence to the grand jury; that she was denied a fair trial when the prosecution failed to make the participant-informant, Samuel Kinsey, available to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sterling H. Nickens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- James W. Harlow, Charles E. Wilson and Thomas F. Addy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- People v. KiihoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. GodlewskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. ArcherdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Eleazer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Penney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. HartmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.