Legal Opinion
People v. Rosenstein
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 1978PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph J aspan, J.
Arthur Rosenstein, a practicing attorney, and his sister, Sondra Rose, are charged with acting in aid of each other in the unlawful placement of a newborn infant and acceptance of a fee therefor in violation of subdivisions 2 and 6 of section 374 of the Social Services Law, class A misdemeanors. The defendants are also charged with a single count of grand larceny in the second degree, a felony.
The defendants do not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence presented to the Grand Jury with respect to the Social Services Law counts, but do ask for an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. ITM, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. LobelNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Noved Realty Corp. v. A. A. P. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- People v. PotworaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- People v. Kirk, New York County Courts1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. First Meridian Planning Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Camelot Group, Ltd. v. W. A. Krueger Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- People v. MichelmanNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. Vanguard Meter Service, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1994
- In re Juan P. H. C.New York Surrogate's Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.