Legal Opinion

People v. Michelman

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1978PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph Jaspan, J.

The defendant moves for an inspection of the Grand Jury minutes and a consequent dismissal of the indictment against him.

The fact pattern as presented to the Grand Jury indi*298cates that in three separate and specified instances the defendant, a practicing attorney, was consulted by a married couple seeking a child for adoption and coincidentally, but not simultaneously, by a pregnant young lady seeking his help in placing an unwanted baby. The resulting physical transfer of the child took place in each case in the parking lot outside the hospital after…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Adoption of E. W. C.New York Surrogate's Court · 1976
  2. People v. RosensteinNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. ScopasNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. People v. SlaterNew York Court of Appeals · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Adoption of Baby Boy M. G.New York Surrogate's Court · 1987
  2. In re Jon K.New York City Family Court · 1988
  3. In re David N.New York City Family Court · 1984
  4. Sarosi v. SobolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. In re Juan P. H. C.New York Surrogate's Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API