Legal Opinion
Gajowski v. Empie
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided January 17, 1951No. Civ. A. No. 3724PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLEY, District Judge.
The defendant moves to vacate a notice of examination, or, in the alternative, limit its general scope, and to quash a subpoena served upon an attorney for the defendant. The litigation arises from an automobile accident and the examination is directed against the insurance carrier of the defendant, Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. This carrier admittedly retained the law firm of Brown & Gallagher to. represent its assured and the subpoena in question was served upon Donald Gallagher, a member of such firm.
The notice of examination is general in its terms and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bough v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Kulich v. MurrayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Hanke v. Milwaukee Electric Ry. & Transport Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1947
- Rosenblum v. DingfelderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Supine v. Compagnie Nationale Air FranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1955
- De Gaetano v. Frank A. Clendaniel, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1953