Legal Opinion

Kulich v. Murray

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 13, 1939PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONGER, District Judge.

This is an application on the part of the defendant MacFadden Publications, Inc., and the Zurich General Accident and Liability Insurance Company, Limited, appearing specially herein, for the purpose of vacating the taking of the deposition of the Zurich General Accident and Liability Insurance Company, Limited, and to quash the subpoena served in connection therewith.

The action is brought to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff due to the alleged negligence of the defendants by reason of a collision…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bough v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Cain v. BarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. Kenealy v. Texas Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  4. Dinter v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  5. Krauss v. Erie R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API