Legal Opinion

De Gaetano v. Frank A. Clendaniel, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided November 27, 1953No. Civ. A. No. 1545PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, District Judge.

This is an action for damages arising out of an automobile collision. Defendants served interrogatories on plaintiff. Interrogatory 3 reads:

“Give the names and addresses of persons from whom statements have been procured in regard to the facts alleged in the complaint.”

Plaintiff’s answer was:

“Thomas Goldsberry U. S. M.C. Naval Hospital Philadelphia, Pa.”

Defendants move under F.R. 34 to compel plaintiff to produce this statement of Goldsberry. The motion states this statement is in possession of plaintiff, contains evidence of plaintiff’s negligence, and is not privileged.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. Pennsylvania R. v. JulianDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1950
  3. Dellameo v. Great Lakes S. S. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949
  4. Bonefond v. Borden Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  5. Gajowski v. EmpieDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blanchet v. Colonial Trust Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API