Bert Ruud and Emma Ruud v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.
An action for condemnation of three parcels of land in Idaho belonging to appellants was brought by the government. There is but one question of importance *461raised. The trial court refused to allow certain farmers, who testified they were well acquainted with the parcels of land and that they knew the farming practices in the vicinity and the value of lands in the particular neighborhood, to give opinions either as to the highest and best use to which the parcels could be put on the date of taking or as to the fair market value of the lands involved in the action…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCandless v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Montana Railway Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Love v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Simmonds v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Chapman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. J. Cyril Johnson and Ray T. LindsayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Hirschell L. Guynes and Mable Ann GuynesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Westby v. SchaeferIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Hutchison v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Adams v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.