Frey v. Stipp
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 379, Jan. T., 1908, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Lackawanna Co., May T., 1908, No. 7, dismissing bill in equity in case of Henry Frey v. Mathias Stipp. Bill in equity to declare a contract void. Before Edwards, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. Error assigned was decree of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The plaintiff sought by bill to have set aside on the ground of fraud a written contract for the purchase of stock, into which he had entered with the defendant. It was found by the judge who heard the testimony that the plaintiff had failed to substantiate the material allegations of his bill; that his testimony was far from being clear and precise and was substantially nullified by his admissions on cross-examination; that it was uncorroborated by other evidence direct or circumstantial. It was not alleged that the defendant made any statement in relation to the organization of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Luther v. LutherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
3Cited by7 opinions
- Caveny v. CurtisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Weisenberger v. HuebnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Namy v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Isett v. MaclaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Keystone Guard v. BeamanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.