Legal Opinion

Namy v. Black

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 1951No. Appeal, 14PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Bell,

Plaintiff brought a bill in equity against his grantors and their real estate agent, who sold him the property, and the mortgagees who took a mortgage thereon, praying that the deed to him from the former owners be canceled, the purchase money be repaid, and his mortgage and accompanying bond be canceled, on the ground, not of fraud, but that a warranty was omitted from the sales agreement by mutual mistake. There was no evidence that the alleged warranty was omitted from the sales agreement by mutual mistake and the court beloAV properly, as we shall see, dismissed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Luther v. LutherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Bowman v. Gum, IncorporatedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Caveny v. CurtisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. Dobkin v. LandsbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Mahaffey v. FergusonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Umbelina v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Robinson v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Snyder v. BarberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Bhatla v. Resort Development Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API